MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7093686535

Kajian impak Pesta Kaul Mukah 2015 / Dr. Tang Howe Eng & Haji Khalik Haji Ibrahim

2015· book· en· W7093686535 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUiTM Institutional Repositories (Universiti Teknologi MARA) · 2015
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)MulticulturalismCitizenship
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pesta Kaul Mukah 2015 telah diadakan di Mukah pada 18 April 2015 sehingga 26 April 2015 bertempat di Tapak Pesta Kaul, Kuala Lama, Mukah. Tema Kaul pada tahun ini ialah ‘Berbudaya Terus Maju’. Pesta Kaul Mukah 2015 turut disambut dengan meriah di sekitar Bandar Mukah. Pesta Kaul merupakan satu pesta keramaian masyarakat Melanau yang menghimpunkan pelbagai acara dan adat resam yang unik. Pesta Kaul diadakan sekali setiap tahun, iaitu pada minggu ketiga April. Pesta Kaul diadakan oleh kaum Melanau di kawasan Mukah, sebuah kawasan yang terletak di persisiran pantai di Sarawak. Pada masa lalu, Kaul adalah sejenis pesta keagamaan yang diraikan oleh masyarakat Melanau Pagan. Ia adalah upacara pemujaan untuk mereka memohon restu daripada penunggu di laut, darat dan hutan agar mendapat ketenteraman serta keselamatan ketika melakukan aktiviti seharian mereka mencari rezeki di tempat-tempat tersebut. Pesta ini biasanya diadakan mengikut kalendar kaum Melanau Pagan yang menandakan berakhirnya musim tengkujuh yang telah mendatangkan kesan dalam kehidupan mereka sebagai petani dan nelayan. Kini, Pesta Kaul menjadi salah satu pesta yang bukan sahaja dapat menghimpunkan masyarakat Melanau secara khususnya, malah telah menghimpunkan pelbagai lapisan masyarakat yang ingin turut berkongsi kemeriahan Pesta Kaul.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUiTM Institutional Repositories (Universiti Teknologi MARA)Same topicLinguistic, Cultural, and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207