A074: National Image, National Brand, and Heritage of Major Sports Events: Exploring the Development Path of Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics Heritage from the Perspective of Communication Studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Purpose: The 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics, with the concept of building a community with a shared future for mankind, were Olympic Games held in Beijing after 2008. Its Olympic heritage is more macro, comprehensive, and distinctive of China, and is an important resource for China's subsequent development. The cultural heritage of the Beijing Winter Olympics, as a world-renowned historical landmark, has a sustained endogenous driving force for the national image and brand building. Although there has been some research on Olympic heritage, it has mainly focused on the Summer Olympics, with relatively few studies on the heritage of the Winter Olympics. The current research on the heritage of the Winter Olympics has mainly discussed the definition and evaluation methods of heritage or analyzed individual categories of heritage such as venue preservation, with less exploration of heritage development strategies. In addition, although existing research has yielded certain results in the subsequent development of heritage from previous Winter Olympics (such as the Vancouver Winter Olympics), each Winter Olympics has its own specific environment and background, and its Olympic heritage also has its own unique characteristics. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a specialized analysis of the heritage of 2008 Beijing Winter Olympics. Based on the analysis of the characteristics of the Beijing Winter Olympics heritage, the purpose of this study was to explore issues such as how to utilize these features in the process of national branding, and ultimately what kind of national image should be formed. Methods/Design: A semi-structured interview was conducted to collect key experiences, opinions, and lessons learned from stakeholders in the construction of selected national brands and the Winter Olympics, to have a deeper understanding of the details of national image construction, national brand development, and the Beijing Winter Olympics and its heritage. Based on the list of stakeholder types mentioned in the literature, the criteria of the population most likely to answer research questions based on their first-hand experience, and expert knowledge of large-scale events, 12 subjects were selected to participate in this study, including members of the Organizing Committee for the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics, partners and sponsors of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics, important mainstream foreign media journalists, academic researchers from domestic and foreign universities in the impact of large-scale events and national brand research. Interviews were conducted from January to June 2022, covering the preparation, organization, and review of the Winter Olympics, providing interviewees with objective evaluation and reflection space. Due to the pandemic, the interviews were mainly conducted online through three apps: Skype, Zoom, and We Chat. The interview was digitally recorded and transcribed with the informed consent of the interviewees, and the interviewee's interview materials were encoded. The collection of data takes saturation as the node until no more information appears. Through constant comparison and inductive analysis, this study developed the relevant characteristics of the cultural heritage of this Winter Olympics and conducted discussions on this basis. Secondly, to make the text materials more detailed and abundant, online ethnography was used, relying on mainstream domestic and foreign online platforms, focusing on comments on the Winter Olympics cultural heritage and national image in the "online community", as part of the source of this research text. Results: The heritage of the Winter Olympics presented four important features that can be utilized in brand building: (1) consensus, resonance, and progress: a major country striving for world unity; (2) Green, environmentally friendly, and sustainable: the business card of the "Double Olympics City"; (3) People oriented and responsible big country: important achievements in the prevention and control of COVID-19 epidemic; (4) Kind, joyful, and youthful: Happy Winter Olympics and sports stars. These features were derived from China's early planning and have been successfully perceived internationally. The dissemination effect was good. Therefore, in subsequent development work, those features should be utilized as a focus and highlight. Conclusion: As an important connotation and clear goal of the cultural heritage of the Beijing Winter Olympics, the benefits of a national brand are considered a key achievement of the host country’s activities. This study specifically analyzed the unique features provided by the Beijing Winter Olympics that can create a national brand, and clarified the interrelationships between major sports events, the development of the host country's national brand, and image building work. Considering the long-term and important nature of national brand building, further research is needed to explore the specific media products and forms in which the characteristics of the Winter Olympics heritage can be applied, as well as how different media products should be coordinated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".