Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diane Kayongo-Male, reviewerRural Health and Aging Research: Theory, Methods, and Practical ApplicationsWilbert M. Gesler, Donna J. Rabiner, and Gordon H. DeFriese, editors\nGeoffrey Grant, reviewerCutting Into the Meatpacking Line: Workers and Change in the Rural MidwestDeborah Fink\nJerome R. Rosonke, reviewerBorn Hutterite (video tape)Black Hat Production\nLaura Colmenero, reviewerCapturing Women: The Manipulation of Cultural Imagery in Canada's Prairie WestSarah Carter\nEllen Baird, reviewerAmerican Indian Ethnic Renewal: Red Power and the Resurgence of Identity and CultureJoane Nagel\nMary Warner, reviewerDurable InequalityCharles Tilly\nJack Niemonen, reviewerCulture of Intolerance: Chauvinism, Class, and Racism in the United StatesMark Cohen\nDavid A. Lopez, reviewerDiversity in the Power Elite: Have Women and Minorities Reached the Top?Richard L. Zweigenhaft and G. William Domhoff\nKathi Rangel-Wrono, reviewerThe Future of Ethnicity, Race, and NationalityWalter L. Wallace\nWilliam Du Bois, reviewerCrime and Punishment in America: Why the Solutions to America's Most Stubborn Social Crisis Have not Worked - and What WillElliot Currie\nElizabeth A. Gill, reviewerModern Social Theory: Key Debates and New DirectionsDerek Layder\nCindi Peno Ceglian, reviewerAdoption, Identity, and Kinship: The Debate Over Sealed Birth RecordsKatrina Wegar\nSusan L.Schrader, reviewerElders' Views on the Right to Die: Facilitating Decisions About Life Sustaining TreatmentCarol Ann Baer\nThomas C. Langham, reviewerCritical Choices: Applying Sociological Insight in Your Life, Family, and CommunityScott Sernau
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it