Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Design and Analysis of Research Studies, by Bryan F.J. Manly. Cambridge, England: Cambridge, University Press, 1992. 353 pp. $89.95(hardcover), $34.95 (softcover). (Reviewed by Lawrence P. Greksa, Case Western Reserve University)\nMorphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology, by Fred L. Bookstein. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1991. 435 pp. $89.95 (hardcover). (Reviewed by Michael Mahaney, Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research)\nAnnual Editions: Physical Anthropology 92/93, edited by Elvio Angeloni. Guilford, CT: Dushkin Publishers, 1992. 148 pp. $9.95 (softcover). (Reviewed by Lynette E. Leidy, SUNY at Binghamton)\nInteractions: The Biological Context of Social Systems, by Niles Eldredge and Marjorie Grene. New York: Columbia University Press, 1992. 242 pp. $40.00 (hardcover). (Reviewed by Jack Kelso, University of Colorado)\nEvolution, Form, and Geography: A Symposium on Human Biology, edited by Charles Oxnard, Jonathan Stone, and Peter White. Perspectives in Human Biology 2 (Archaeology in Oceania, v. 27, no. 2). Nedlands, Australia: Centre for Human Biology, University of Western Australia, 1992. 79 pp. $16.00. (Reviewed by Gabriel W. Lasker, Wayne State University)\nAdvances in Body Composition Assessment, by Timothy G. Lohman. Current Issues in Exercise Science (CIES), Monograph 3. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers, 1992. 150 pp. $18.00 (softcover). (Reviewed by Rita Wellens, Wright State University)\nDiet, Demography, and Disease: Changing Perspectives on Anemia, edited by Patricia Stuart-Macadam and Susan Kent. Foundations of Human Behavior. New York: Aldine De Gruyter, 1992. 285 pp. $59.95 (hardcover). (Reviewed by George R. Milner, Pennsylvania State University)\nHuman Cancer: Epidemiology and Environmental Causes, by J. Higginson, C.S. Muir, and N. Munoz. Cambridge Monographs on Cancer Research. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1992. 577 pp. $125.00. (Reviewed by Susan Galloway Hilsenbeck, University of Texas Health Science Center)\nBiological Markers in Epidemiology, by Barbara S. Hulka, Timothy C. Wilcosky, and Jack D. Griffith. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1990. 256 pp. $40.00. (Reviewed by Charles Hoff, University of South Alabama Medical Center)\nObservations on the Soviet/ Canadian Transpolar Ski Trek, edited by R.J. Shephard and A. Rode. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 1992. 190 pp. $157. (David A. Hay, LaTrobe University)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.021 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".