MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7093846369

La educación administrativa europea

2010· article· es· W7093846369 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIcesi Digital Library (Icesi University) · 2010
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTechnology in Education and Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEuropean commissionEuropean unionContext (archaeology)Quarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Al examinar el modelo de educación administrativa en Europa, es útil distinguir entre dos tipos o niveles amplios de educación administrativa. El primero de ellos consiste en una educación inicial en el campo comercial preexperiencial, previo a la práctica administrativa, el cual ocurre después de haber completado la educación secundaria, a veces, después de un periodo de educación superior. Esto sucede antes de que los estudiantes hayan tenido cualquier experiencia administrativa importante, aunque ya hubieran tenido un empleo o desempeñado un cargo en alguna industria. Se trata, en general, de un primer grado o diploma, es decir, un programa de pregrado o, en ocasiones, una maestría en administración comercial que sigue directamente a cualquier otro tipo de educación. Tales cursos son ofrecidos por escuelas comerciales, universidades e instituciones vocacionales superiores.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.005
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it