Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clinical Nutrition: A Physiologic Approach. By M. H. Overton and B. P. Lukert. xi + 171 pp. Yearbook Medical Publishers, Chicago, 1977. $10.75. (Reviewed by Gail G. Harrison, University of Arizona) Human Fertility: The Basic Components. By Henri Leridon, Translated by Judith F. Helzner. vi + 202 pp. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1977. $19.00. (Reviewed by Kenneth M. Weiss, University of Texas) Human Biology: An Introduction to Human Evolution, Variation, Growth and Ecology. By G. A. Harrison, J. S. Weiner, J. M. Tanner, N. A. Barnicot, with a chapter on “The Evolution of Human Society,” by V. Reynolds. Second edition, xiv + 499 pp. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1977. $10.00. (Reviewed by Ivan G Pawson, University of California) The People of Asia. By G. T. Bowles. 414 pp. Scribner’s, New York, 1977. $14.95. (Reviewed by W. W. Howells, Harvard University) Biology of Aging. By M. J. Lamb, vi + 184 pp. John Wiley, New York, 1977. $12.75. (Reviewed by Gary A. Borkan, VA Outpatient Clinic Boston) Fetus into Man. Physical Growth from Conception to Maturity. By J. M. Tanner. 250 pp. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1978. $10.00. (Reviewed by Francis E. Johnston, University of Pennsylvania) The Biology of High-Altitude Peoples. Edited by P. T. Baker, xii + 357 pp. International Biological Programme 14. Cambridge University Press, London and New York, 1978. $39.50. (Reviewed by Jean Hiernaux, Université Paris) Eskimos of Northwestern Alaska: A Biological Perspective. Edited by P.L. Jamison, S. L. Zegura and F. A. Milan, xx + 319 pp. US/IBPSynthesis Series, No. 8. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Inc. Stroudsburg, Pa., 1978. $24.50. (Reviewed by Michael A. Little, State University of New York) Biokinetics and Biodynamics of Human Differentiation: Principles and Applications. ByE. Blechschmidt and R. F. Gasser, xvi + 285 pp. C. C Thomas, Springfield, 1978. $24.50. (Reviewed by Geoffery H. Sperber, University of Alberta) Growth and Development; Physique (Proceedings volume of the Symposium on Human Biology, Balatonfured, Hungary, September 1976). Edited by O. G. Eiben. 498 pp. Akademiai Kiado, Publishing House of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, 1977. $30.00. (Reviewed by Robert M. Malina, University of Texas)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.495 | 0.480 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".