ÐбгÑÑнÑÑÐ²Ð°Ð½Ð½Ñ Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶Ð»Ð¸Ð²Ð¾ÑÑÑ ÐºÐ°ÑÑÑÐ²Ð°Ð½Ð½Ñ Ð½Ð°ÑÑогазопеÑÑпекÑÐ¸Ð²Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¾Ð±'ÑкÑÑв на оÑÐ½Ð¾Ð²Ñ ÑейÑмогÑавÑÑаÑÑйного моделÑÐ²Ð°Ð½Ð½Ñ ÐеÑÑкÑвÑÑко-ÐоÑоÑиÑÑÐºÐ¾Ñ ÑÑÑÑкÑÑÑно-ÑекÑонÑÑÐ½Ð¾Ñ Ð¿Ñдзони ÐÑвнÑÑного боÑÑÑ ÐÐÐ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Study of deep structure of the Eastern oil-and-gas-bearing region of Ukraine is one of its strategic tasks\ntowards increasing of the proven oil-and-gas reserves and ensuring of its energy security. The necessary step in this\ndirection is the continuation of practice of geological and geophysical studies throughout the whole territory with\nthe help of the new advanced methods and techniques that, on a new qualitative level, will allow correlating of all\nthe information on the complex deep structure of oil-and-gas-bearing regions of Ukraine accumulated for many\ndecades. One of the solution aspects of the oil-and-gas-bearing capacity prediction task of the promising Leskivk-\nKorotych structural tectonic subzone of the Northern DDd edge on the basis of the geophysical data is the\nevaluation of possibility of oil-and-gas-saturated objects study on the basis of the gravity survey data in\ncombination with other geological and geophysical data. To achieve this goal, the petrophysical model of the\nreservoir rock density was developed and changes in the rock volume density and gravitational effects values on the\nsurface that produce these changes were calculated on the example of Svyrydivke gas-condensate field. The\nprinciple registration possibility of such low-amplitude effects was confirmed using the modern digital gravimeters\nof Scintrex Company (Canada).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.023 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.022 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".