MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7094149133

9783903187511.pdf

2020· other· de· W7094149133 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation) · 2020
Typeother
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicQualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeorge (robot)Subject (documents)Theme (computing)Memoir
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The history of the literary relations between Austria and Canada has not yet been written; however, the present volume dedicated to voices like Hans Eichner, Henry Kreisel, Carl Weiselberger, Egon Schwarz, Ruth Klüger, Monique Bosco, Thomas Bernhard, and others is a first step in this direction. - Die Geschichte der literarischen Beziehungen zwischen Österreich und Kanada ist zwar noch ungeschrieben, der vorliegende Band mit Beiträgen zu Hans Eichner, Henry Kreisel, Carl Weiselberger, Egon Schwarz, Ruth Klüger, Monique Bosco, Thomas Bernhard und anderen stellt jedoch einen ersten Schritt in diese Richtung dar.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9930.999

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation)Same topicQualitative Comparative Analysis ResearchFrench-language works237,207