MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7094149838

STATUS OF 10 BIRD SPECIES OF CONSERVATION CONCERN IN US FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE REGION 6

2013· article· W7094149838 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInsecta mundi · 2013
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWildlifeTreatyFish <Actinopterygii>PopulationWildlife tradeWildlife conservationService (business)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

All native migratory birds in the United States and Canada are protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) of 1918 (16 U.S.C. §§ 703 – 712). Three additional countries have signed this act, including Mexico (1936), Japan, and Russia (1976). Although these avian species are protected, permits for direct take can be issued for activities such as depredation, salvage and scientific collection (USFWS 2012a). However the USFWS currently lacks the ability to assess the potential consequences of these increases on the vast majority of birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Consequently, there is an urgent need to summarize the current population status, data limitations, and the potential impacts of increased direct take on relevant populations and subpopulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInsecta mundiSame topicAvian ecology and behaviorFrench-language works237,207