LATE ROMAN COOKING WARES FROM NORA (SARDINIA): \nINTERIM ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND ARCHAEOMETRICAL STUDY.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This contribution aims to present the interim results of an archaeological and archaeometric research on the cooking wares from the \ncentral quarter of Nora (Cagliari, Sardinia) where a team from the University of Milano identified several Late Roman residences. \nThe morphological analysis of the different groups has put in evidence a low variation of the types except for their size. The \narchaeometrical data show that most of the analysed materials may correspond to a local or regional production (with certain \ndegree of variation) of cooking wares widely used in Nora in the Late Roman Period. It is important to stress that petrographic \nanalysis shows that the compositional characteristics of the non-plastics inclusions are compatible with the surrounding geology of \nNora. This study of the LRCW from Nora is just a small part of a much broader analytical program on Sardinian Late Roman \nCooking Wares.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.029 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.018 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".