MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7094287611

The Cisuralian Ammonoid Genus <i>Uraloceras</i>

2004· article· W7094287611 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholar Works (Boise State University) · 2004
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature: history, themes, analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenusFaunaEndemismTaxonStructural basinPangaeaBiostratigraphy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ammonoids occur abundantly within Cisuralian strata at Beck Springs, Buck Mountain, Nevada. The genus Uraloceras has been recovered from a micritic concretionary interval deposited within a tectonically initiated sub-basin of the Cisuralian Dry Mountain Trough. The abundant and diverse fauna at Beck Springs, Buck Mountain contain faunal elements characteristic of a transitional paleobiogeographic association, which includes "Boreal", equatorial, cosmopolitan, and endemic forms. Endemism may have been associated with paleogeographic isolation of basins and sub-basins on the western margin of Northern Pangaea.\nUraloceras is biostratigraphically restricted to Sakmarian through early Kungurian of northern Pangaea and further restricted to Artinskian strata in North America. Uraloceras is also an important paleobiogeographic indicator because it is restricted to "Boreal" and "Transitional" associations along the continental margins of Northern Pangaea. The genus Uraloceras occurs throughout Northern Pangaea: the Ural Mountains, Novaya Zemlya, the Verkhoyansk Mountains, China (Nei Monggol and Gansu), Ellesmere Island, the Yukon, British Columbia, Alaska, and Nevada. Four representatives of Uraloceras are recognized in this study; U involutum, U burtiense, U fedorowi, U n. sp. A.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholar Works (Boise State University)Same topicLiterature: history, themes, analysisFrench-language works237,207