MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7094369397

Population and governingstructure of Georgia State of Ottoman Empire in the last quarter of 16th century

2016· dissertation· tr· W7094369397 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeArsiv - Adu (Adnan Menderes University) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languagetr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicChristian Theology and Mission
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOttoman empireQuarter (Canadian coin)State (computer science)PopulationEmpire
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

İstanbul'da Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşiv Kataloğunda Osmanlı dönemi Gürcistan Eyaletine ait Tapu Tahrir Defterleri arasında bulunan 16 yüzyıl son çeyreğinde (H.981 ) M.1573-1574 tarihine ait TT. 0525 numaralı tek defterde yer alan bilgiler ışığında Gürcistan eyaleti yerleşimlerinin idari, sosyal ve ekonomik yapısı açıklanmaya çalışılacaktır. TT. 0525 numaralı tapu tahrir defteri Yüksek Lisans Tezimizin ana kaynağını oluşturmaktadır. Bu defter İstanbul Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi'nden eksiksiz olarak elde edilip transkribe edilmiştir. Bu defterde 16. Yüzyıl Osmanlı Devleti'nin Kuzey Doğu Anadolu topraklarının parçası olan Osmanlı Devleti Gürcistan Eyaletinde bulunan yerleşim birimlerinin isimleri, bu yerleşim birimlerinin barındırdığı nüfusa ait veriler, bu nüfustan alınan vergiler ve İran sınırının kuzey bölgesini oluşturan bu coğrafyadaki Osmanlı idari yapısını ortaya çıkarmak amaçlanmaktadır. Çalışmamızın ana kaynağını oluşturan T.T. 0525 numaralı Tapu tahrir defterinin daha önce transkribe edilmemiş olması tezin değerini arttıran bir durumdur, ayrıca bu coğrafya ile daha önce yapılmış çalışmalardan da yararlanılarak elde edilen bilgiler karşılaştırılacaktır.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.400
Threshold uncertainty score0.795

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeArsiv - Adu (Adnan Menderes University)Same topicChristian Theology and MissionFrench-language works237,207