MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7094392494

Review of <i>Handbook of North American Indians</i> Volume 13. <i>Plains</i>. Edited by Raymond J. DeMallie

2002· article· W7094392494 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLincoln (University of Nebraska) · 2002
Typearticle
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicHistory and Developments in Astronomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPraiseLiteral (mathematical logic)State (computer science)Volume (thermodynamics)Literal and figurative language
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INDIANS AND ANTHROPOLOGISTS To say that the Plains volume of the Smithsonian Institution's Handbook of North American Indians has been long awaited is a literal as well as a figurative verity. Research for the volume began in 1971, then stalled until 1985, when Raymond DeMallie took over as editor and reinvigorated the project. Still, progress remained slow until 1998, as other volumes in the series were given priority. Then an all-out push was made to complete the work: manuscripts written in the 1970s and 1980s were revised, often through the addition of a co-author, and the content was generally updated to reflect the state of knowledge in the 1990s. The last manuscript was accepted on 14 November 2000, a year before publication. The wait was worthwhile. The final product is a comprehensive and scholarly synthesis of Plains Indian ways of life from 12,000 BCE to the 1990s, from the Prairies of Canada to the Rio Grande, and from archaeological records to tribal traditions. The volume (which comes in two parts of about seven hundred pages each) is handsomely presented: there are photographs on almost every page, each explicated in detail as to provenance and content in an accompanying caption, and frequent 217 maps expertly done. If the reader needs additional information beyond the mass of material in each chapter, the bibliography contains more than two hundred pages of references, drawn from many scholarly fields. DeMallie deserves praise not only for pulling it all together, but for his own chapter contributions seven in all, either as sole or joint author. It is a major accomplishment. Beneath the main content conveying the remarkable diversity and richness of Plains Indian societies, there is a subtext that reveals the ways anthropologists have interacted with and represented indigenous peoples. Most of the authors are anthropologists, with a sprinkling of historians and scholars from other disciplines. Only one scholar-JoAllyn Archambault-has a tribal affiliation noted in the list of contributors. Possibly there are other Native Americans here who chose not to give their tribal affiliation, but it seems they are poorly represented. There is a tradition of collaboration between anthropologists and Indian experts-Alice Fletcher and Francis La Flesche, for example-and it would have been enterprising on the part of their writers to have co-authored some chapters in this manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0500.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLincoln (University of Nebraska)Same topicHistory and Developments in AstronomyFrench-language works237,207