Ðовий пÑдÑÑд до наÑÑогазоноÑного ÑайонÑÐ²Ð°Ð½Ð½Ñ Ñ Ð¿ÐµÑÑпекÑив пÑомиÑÐ»Ð¾Ð²Ð¾Ñ Ð½Ð°ÑÑогазоноÑноÑÑÑ Ðолино-ÐодÑлÑÑÑÐºÐ¾Ñ Ð¿Ð»Ð¸Ñи Ñа плаÑÑоÑмового ÑÑÐ¸Ð»Ñ ÐеÑедкаÑпаÑÑÑкого пÑогинÑ
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article deals with possible sources of crude hydrocarbon production within the Volyn-Podolsk plate and\nouter zone of the Precarpathian foredeep, which are refered to as a single bitumen-, oil- and gas-bearing area. The\npetroleum potential in both conventional and unconventional reservoirs is considered. Within the Volyn-Podolsk\nplate there is a possibility of presense of conventional reservoirs in the Lower Paleozoic sediments associated with\nthe reefogenic formations similar to the Western Canadian NGRs. The authors believe that the possible\nunconventional reservoirs within the Volyn-Podolsk plate are the coal-bearing strata of the Lviv-Volyn coal basin,\nwith the preference given to gas extraction not from coal seams but from rocks containing them. The fact that coal is\nalso a valuable mineral is emphasized. In the outer zone of the Precarpathian foredeep (under the condition that the\ndirectional wells are drilled) the prospects of gas extraction are provided to sand-clay sediments of the Neogene,\nwhich are greatly enriched with organic matter. All the above mentioned issues are considered from the perspective\nof maintaining normal environmental situation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.013 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it