MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7094553788

Review of <i>Larry McMurtry: A Critical Companion</i> By John\nM. Reilly

2001· article· W7094553788 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInsecta mundi · 2001
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAcademic Writing and Publishing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReading (process)Subject (documents)Style (visual arts)FeelingPerspective (graphical)Writing styleEPICKey (lock)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In his recent travel book, Roads: Driving America's Great Highways, Larry McMurtry declares himself a plainsman born and bred. He makes no bones about his preference for the American West-especially the Great Plains-over the East and the South. Certainly much of McMurtry's fiction implicitly suggests this preference. His Pulitzer Prize-winning novel, Lonesome Dove, for example, follows an epic nineteenth-century cattle drive from the tip of south Texas to Montana near the Canadian border, and the writer's feeling for the land comes through loud and clear in his descriptive prose.\nThat McMurtry was chosen as the subject of one of the volumes in Greenwood Press's Critical Companions to Popular Contemporary Writers series testifies to his best-selling status with the reading public. The Greenwood series appears to be aimed primarily at students-particularly high school students. Thus the style and content of Larry McMurtry: A Critical Companion are calibrated to what a fairly intelligent adolescent might reasonably be able to read and comprehend.\nLet me say up front that I do not consider this circumstance necessarily to be a weakness of the book. In fact, speaking as someone who has had his fill of jargon-laden postmodernist literary criticism, I enjoyed reading a clearly written, straightforward analysis of the work of a writer I have followed for most of my adult life. John M. Reilly, director of the graduate program at Howard University, although not (to my knowledge) a scholar of Western American literature, offers a critical perspective on McMurtry's fiction that is genuinely helpful, even to experts in the field.\nReilly considers each of McMurtry's novels from Horseman, Pass By (1961) to Duane's Depressed (1999). He tends to focus on technical aspects of the works, such as narrative strategy, character development, stylistic elements, and theme. Instead of proceeding chronologically through the McMurtry canon, Reilly groups novels according to their subject matter: the so-called "Lonesome Dove tetralogy," for instance-Lonesome Dove, Streets of Laredo, Dead Man's Walk, and Comanche Moon-is treated in a chapter called "A New History of the Old West."\nThough he occasionally offers a negative comment, Reilly is generally highly favorable in his judgment of McMurtry's achievement. He even mounts a spirited defense of the writer against those critics who believe McMurtry is sometimes guilty of thematic confusion and technical sloppiness. Larry McMurtry, if he cares about his reputation, must hope to attract more commentators as sympathetic as John M. Reilly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.762
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInsecta mundiSame topicAcademic Writing and PublishingFrench-language works237,207