Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human Evolution. Edited by M. H. Day. vii + 154 pp. Barnes and Noble Books, New York, 1973. $11.00. (Reviewed by C. Owen Lovejoy, Kent State University) Cranial Variation in Man—A Study by Multivariate Analysis of Patterns of Difference among Recent Human Populations. By W. W. Howells, ix + 259 pp. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, Vol. 67, 1973. (Reviewed by E. H. Ashton, Birmingham University) The Human Biology of Aborigines in Cape York. Ed. by R. L. Kirk. Australian Aboriginal Studies No. 44. ix + 109 pp. Australian Inst, of Aboriginal Stud., Canberra, 1973. (Reviewed by R. A. Littlewood, Washington State University) Biological Studies of Yemenite and Kurdish Jews in Israel and Other Groups in Southwest Asia. Parts I-XIII. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B. Biological Sciences, 266: 83-224, 1973. £5.25 ($12.60). (Reviewed by Ralph M. Garruto, National Institutes of Health) Population Dynamics. Edited by T. N. E. Greville. ix + 445 pp. Academic Press, New York, $13.50. (Reviewed by D. F. Roberts, University of Newcastle upon Tyne) Mans Future Birhtright: Essays on Science and Humanity. By H. J. Muller, edited by E. A. Carlson, xxi + 164 pp. State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, 1973. $6.95 cloth, $3.95 paper. (Reviewed by Kenneth Morgan, University of Alberta) Genetic Structure of Populations. Edited by N. Morton. 313 pp. The University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, 1974. $17.50. (Reviewed by Donald J. Nash, Colorado State University)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.743 | 0.757 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".