Review of <em>Nature and Scripture in the Abrahamic Religions: Up to 1700</em>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 36th entry in Brill's Series in Church History, this impressive anthology of two volumes resulted from a workshop held in 2005 at Redeemer University College in Ancaster, Ontario, involving historians of interpretation of the Hebrew Bible, the Christian Bible of Old and New Testaments, and the Qur'an (scripture), and historians of science from colleges and universities in Canada, the United States, England, Spain, Germany, and The Netherlands.Their aim was to fill gaps in research conducted within the confines of their respective disciplines by probing the interaction between the interpretation of scripture and the interpretation of natural phenomena by philosophers and scientists through the seventeenth century, and explain why this interaction occurred (pp.3-4).The result of their deliberations is a compilation of twentythree informative essays divided into four parts, each of which spans a specific period of time.In the first volume are three parts that cover the years 100-800, 800-1450, and 1450-1700.Addressing the first period are illuminating essays by Pamela Bright, who specializes in the first five centuries of Christian communities, Kenneth F. Howell, whose research focuses primarily
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".