MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7094949770 · doi:10.1515/bejm-2025-0024

Firm Dynamics, Informality, and Monetary Policy

2025· article· en· W7094949770 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueThe B E Journal of Macroeconomics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicTaxation and Compliance Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsMonetary policyInflation (cosmology)Monetary transmission mechanismInformal sectorNew Keynesian economicsCredit channelShadow (psychology)Inflation targeting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A prominent structural feature of many developing countries is the presence of a large shadow or informal economy, which often serves as a form of insurance during economic downturns. Despite this understanding, the impact of the informal economy on inflation and output dynamics in these countries remains poorly understood. This study investigates the extent to which monetary policy can stabilize economies with a large informal market. First, we use VAR analysis to provide new evidence indicating that the labor informality rate increases in response to contractionary monetary policy. Second, we explore the transmission mechanism of monetary policy through a two-sector New Keynesian (NK) model that incorporates endogenous firm entry. This analysis allows us to examine the role of informality in sectoral reallocation, inflation, and output dynamics. Our findings suggest that, under a reasonable calibration of the model, the presence of a flexible, informal sector results in a lower sacrifice ratio in response to a tightening of monetary policy. This suggests that informality enhances the effectiveness of monetary policy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.430
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe B E Journal of MacroeconomicsSame topicTaxation and Compliance StudiesFrench-language works237,207