MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7094950288 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17435999

Bridge2AI Voice REDCap

2025· other· W7094950288 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typeother
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInformed consentElectronic data captureQuality (philosophy)Clinical trialDrug industry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Release notes - Bridge2AI - Bridge2AI REDCap - v4.3.0 Story B2AI-801 B2AI REDCap | Add Consent Date B2AI-802 B2AI REDCap | Remove video consents from Consent Method B2AI-817 B2AI REDCap | Remove Pediatric Placeholder in Eligible Studies B2AI-818 B2AI REDCap | Update Data Dissemination exclude reasons What's Changed v4.3.0 by @alexsigaras in https://github.com/eipm/bridge2ai-redcap/pull/35 Full Changelog: https://github.com/eipm/bridge2ai-redcap/compare/v4.2.0...v4.3.0

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.038
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.038
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0120.008
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9230.905

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare→French-language works237,207→