Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cheilosia (Cheilosia) latifrons (Zetterstedt, 1843) Fig. 40 Eristalis latifrons Zetterstedt, 1843: 811. Cheilosia intonsa Loew, 1858: 588. Syn. by Speight & Lucas (1992). Cheilosia intonsa – Stackelberg & Richter 1968: 246. — Stackelberg 1970: 59. — Peck 1988: 105. — Barkalov 1993: 714. Cheilosia latifrons – Mengual et al. 2020: 17. Differential diagnosis The female of Cheilosia latifrons has the combination of a pilose face and bare eye, unique amongst Caucasian species of Cheilosia. In the male, the combination of a pilose face, pilose eye and posterior margin of scutellum without setae is, within the Caucasus, only shared with C. pseudogrossa. The male C. latifrons differs from that of C. pseudogrossa by being much smaller (body length 7–9 mm vs 12–13 mm), parafacia broad (narrow in C. pseudogrossa) and eye with white sparse pile (with dense black pile in C. pseudogrossa). Material examined ARMENIA – Kotayk Province • 1 ♂; Tsaghkadzor, Y.S.U. Rest House; 40.533625° N, 44.703028° E; 1915 m a.s.l.; 23 May 2022; X. Mengual leg.; ZFMK, ZFMK-DIP-00093658 = ZFMK-TIS-8014607. GEORGIA – Mtskheta-Mtianeti • 1 ♀; Tbilisi N.P.; 41.880° N, 45.023° E; 1289 m a.s.l.; 4 May 2023; S. Bot leg.; SBA, SB.002371 = ZFMK-TIS-8028020. Genetics The DNA barcodes of Caucasian specimens cluster together with sequences from Europe with high support (BS = 100%). Remarks Stackelberg & Richter (1968) reported this species as C. intonsa from two localities in Armenia. We are not aware of any other published records from the Caucasus. Thus, we provide the first record of this species for Georgia and new records for Armenia after more than five decades. Biology During our expeditions, collected between 4 May and 23 May at an altitude between 1289 and 1915 m a.s.l. Distribution Palaearctic. Within the Caucasus known from Armenia and Georgia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".