From Hannibal to Sulla: The Logic of Civil War and the Moral Transformation of the Roman Republic (2018–2019 Research Framework)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research note presents the conceptual framework of the project The Logic of Civil War in the Hannibalic and Social Wars, developed between October 2018 and May 2019 and later integrated into ongoing work on Roman political culture, emotion, and legitimacy.Originally submitted to the Government of Ireland Postdoctoral Fellowship 2019 (Irish Research Council, University College Dublin) and revised for a Humboldt Fellowship proposal at the Technische Universität Braunschweig, the project explored how external warfare, collective fear, and moral transgression progressively merged into the logic of internal conflict that would later define the first century BCE.By reinterpreting the Social War (91–87 BCE) as the first true bellum civile, the study traced the moral and emotional transformation of the Roman Republic from the Hannibalic War to Sulla’s dictatorship. This document is an archival record for scholarly transparency and citation purposes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".