Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture Reflection on the Pursuit of Harmonious Community
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Community is the fundamental compound that people live and thrive in current society. There are many vital connections between community and society. Communities constitute the basic units of a society while society is the integration of communities. Therefore, a good community is the underpinning of a harmonious society. The development of society demands the development of communities. The crucial point to achieve the good community so as to build up the harmonious society is to comprehend the value and norms in the community culture and to properly extend these characteristics in the larger society. The paper started from interpreting the concepts and characteristics of the communities, analyzed the common natures and relations between community and society. It also deliberated the meaning of community building on the pursuit of a harmonious society. In addition, the article further discussed how to achieve a harmonious community and society through building up community cultural values. Key words: community; harmonious community; harmonious society Résumé: La communauté est le cadre fondamental de la vie moderne, et elle constitue également l'unité fondamentale de la société. Les liens sociaux sont nombreux et inévitables entre la communauté et la société. La société est une intégration organique des communautés, et le développement communautaire est devenue la demande de notre époque et la base pour construire une société harmonieuse. Par conséquent, il faut saisir la direction du développement communautaire à partir des valeurs socio-culturelles communes de la communauté et de la société. A partir de la conception et les caractéristiques
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.027 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".