172 Canadian Journal of Counselling/Revue canadienne de counseling/1998, Vol. 32:2 Personal Authori ty A m o n g Cathol ic Seminarians: Influence of Age and Ethnicity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Personal authority is defined as the ability to balance individuation and intimacy in relation-ships with family and peers. Personal Authority in the Family System Questionnaire—College Version (PAFS-QVC) was completed by Catholic seminarians in Canada. Results of this research were compared to other studies of men. Seminarians were found to have more personal authority on most scales. Differences correlating to age and ethnicity were found. On the triangulation scale, scores were significantly correlated with age. On the peer individuation and peer intimacy scales, ethnic differences were found. A critic of PAFS-QVC is given. The implications for counselling are discussed. Résumé L'autorité personnelle se définit comme la capacité de trouver l'équilibre entre l'individuation et l'intimité dans les rapports familiaux et dans les relations avec les pairs. Des séminaristes catholiques au Canada ont complété le questionnaire sur l'autorité personnelle dans le système familial—version postsecondaire (Personal Authority in the Family System Questionnaire—College Version [PAFS-QVC]). On a comparé les résultats de cette recherche à d'autres études dont
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.058 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".