RESEARCH ARTICLE An evaluation of meniscal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
er with a heterogeneous structure. The semi-lunar, wedge brous connective tissue (i.e. ligament, tendon) and hya-Andrews et al. BMC Medical Imaging 2013, 13:21 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/13/21nantly of circumferentially oriented fibres [6]. The studyCalgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada Full list of author information is available at the end of the articleshapes of the menisci increase the contact area between the rounded femoral condyles and the relatively flat tibia plateau, thereby protecting the articular cartilage from excessive stresses [1–3]. Menisci are fibrocartilages, which line cartilage [4]. The composition and structure of the meniscus has been studied extensively since Fairbank discovered the re-lationship between meniscal removal and the observation of degenerative changes in the knee [5]. An early investi-gation of the menisci by Bullough et al. in [6], described the structure of human menisci as consisting predomi-
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".