MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7095227992

Interpretive Opinions

2013· article· en· W7095227992 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicTaxation and Compliance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsState (computer science)Statutory lawInterpretation (philosophy)Quarter (Canadian coin)Session (web analytics)Judicial interpretationFirst amendment
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pursuant to SSTGB Rule 803.2, this document contains the amendments, and rules related thereto, and interpretive opinions adopted by the Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board (SSTGB) during 2013. While some amendments may include a specific future effective date, most are adopted without a specific effective date. Absent a specific effective date, the date by which a state must conform to an amendment is the date upon which a state may be sanctioned. Pursuant to Section of 809 of the SSUTA, if a state is required to make a statutory change to comply with any amendment to the SSUTA, or interpretation or interpretive rule adopted by the SSTGB, the state may not be sanctioned for failure to comply with the amendments and rules “…until the later of the first day of January at least two years after the adoption of the amendment … or the first day of a calendar quarter following the end of one full session of the state’s legislature.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.035
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.162
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0350.162
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0070.008
Scholarly communication0.0160.011
Open science0.0060.006
Research integrity0.0100.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1100.061

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTaxation and Compliance StudiesFrench-language works237,207