MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7095263719

PRELIMINARY COMMUNICATION Neisseria gonorrhoeae Treatment Failure andSusceptibility toCefixime inToronto,Canada

2015· article· en· W7095263719 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive tract infections research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeisseria gonorrhoeaeCefiximeAzithromycinCephalosporinDoxycyclineAntimicrobialGonorrheaAntibioticsNeisseria
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BECAUSE OF NEISSERIA GONOR-rhoeae resistance to all priorfirst-line antimicrobial agents,cephalosporin therapywith ad-juvant azithromycin or doxycycline is recommended for treatment of gonor-rhea.1-5 Cefixime is the only oral ceph-alosporin recommended for gonor-rhea treatment, critical to the success of expedited partner therapy. An in-crease in theminimum inhibitory con-centration (MIC) of N gonorrhoeae to cefixime, and to a lesser extent, an in-tramuscularly administered cephalo-sporin, ceftriaxone, has been identi-fied in cultured isolates worldwide.6-8 The World Health Organization has sounded alarms for the threat of un-treatable gonorrhea.9 The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently re-vised recommendations for treatment of uncomplicated urogenital, anorec-tal, and pharyngeal gonorrhea.4 Ceftri-axone, 250 mg, intramuscularly com-bined with either azithromycin, 1 g, orally or doxycycline, 100 mg, orally twice a day for 7 days is the sole pre-ferred treatment regimen, with oral cephalosporins no longer recom-mended as front-line therapy. If cefix-ime is used as an alternative therapy for gonorrhea, it is to be followed with a test of cure in 1 week. Use of cefiximeSee also p 185 and Patient Page.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.691
Threshold uncertainty score0.615

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0650.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReproductive tract infections researchFrench-language works237,207