Prince George Crisis Intervention Society
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The community of Prince George, located in the Northern Interior of British Columbia, has limited resources to assist suicide attempters although it has one of the highest suicide rates in the province. The community also has difficulty attracting and retaining profes-sional counsellors. Consequently, those who attempt suicide are often left to deal with their problems alone. The Prince George Suicide Attempt Follow-Up Program is designed to train paraprofessionals to address the critical needs of suicide attempters. An evaluation of this project demonstrated the project's success in the preparation of paraprofessionals to work with suicide attempters while also highlighting some essential components of support and evaluation that must be met before the program can be fully implemented. Résumé La communauté de Prince George, située au nord de la Colombie-Britannique, possède des ressources limitées pour pouvoir assister les individus à tendances suicidaires même si cette communauté présente un très haut niveau de suicide dans la province. La commu-nauté fait face à une autre difficulté, celle de retenir les conseillers professionnels. Par
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.135 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".