SUMMARY The Geological Association of Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Presidential Address is traditionally delivered by the outgoing President of the Association at the annual general meeting; in this case, GeoCanada 2010, held in Calgary, Alberta, provided the opportunity for the 2010 address. The objectives of the address, and of this paper, are: • To outline the status and trend information and observations on what economic and natural drivers influenced geoscience societies and geoscience careers in Canada over the last 10 years; • To anticipate what the future might hold for individual geoscien-tists and the organizations for whom they work; • To encourage more support for geoscience societies from geosci-entists and their employers; and • To call for a renewal of coopera-tion between geoscience associa-tions in Canada and abroad. SOMMAIRE Conformément à la tradition le prési-dent sortant de l’Association géologique du Canada a profité de la tenue de GeoCanada 2010, à Calgary, Alberta pour livrer le message du prési-dent 2010. Les objectifs de son mes-sage – et du présent article sont les suivants: • Décrire l’état et la tendance de l’in-formation et des observations sur les facteurs économiques et naturels qui ont influés sur les sociétés et les carrières géoscien-tifiques au Canada au cours des 10 dernières années; • Projeter les changements à venir tant pour les personnes que pour les organismes où elles travaillent; • Attiser l’aide aux sociétés géoscien-tifiques de la part des géoscien-tifiques et de leurs employeurs; et • Promouvoir la répétition de la coopération entre les associations géoscientifiques canadiennes et étrangères.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.241 | 0.092 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".