Pilgrimage as Performance: Ste. Ann de Beaupre.” New Directions in Folklore. 4/2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pilgrimage, like the urban legend and the traditional material transmitted by means of the office copying machine, is a folklore genre which is flourishing in the modern world; according to Victor Turner, the number of pilgrims at the world's major shrines is still increasing. However, unlike these forms, pilgrimage is not usually regarded as a performance genre. Between 1970 and 1980 I observed pilgrim behavior at local shrines in Buffalo and on the Niagara Frontier and in the summer of 1981 I spent two weeks at the shrine of St. Anne at Beaupre in Quebec. It became become increasingly obvious to me that pilgrims are very aware of their performance, that they learn to be pilgrims, and may acquire a greater or lesser degree of skill in this role. Some people reach a level which can only be described as professional; others, as David Hufford as pointed out, never really learn to be pilgrims. While I certainly do not quarrel with Victor and Edith Turner's brilliant analysis of pilgrimage as communitas and flow experience, I feel that they have overlooked certain very self-conscious aspects of pilgrimage behavior. (Turner 1995)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".