MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7095368327

AUDIT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE

2014· article· en· W7095368327 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFolklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAudit committeeNoticeChief audit executiveCorporate governanceAttendanceGovernorAudit
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Committee shall be comprised of not less than three (3) directors (the “members”) appointed under Section 9 of the Bank of Canada Act. All members of the Committee shall be financially literate or become financially literate in a reasonable amount of time. The Chair of the Committee shall be designated by the Board from among the members. The Board may remove or replace any member at any time. A member shall hold office until the Board member resigns, is replaced or removed or ceases to be a director, whichever first occurs. The Governor, Senior Deputy Governor and Lead Director shall receive notice of, and shall be entitled to attend, meetings of the Committee, provided that the Committee may meet in camera at its discretion. All decisions of the Board regarding membership and Chair of this Committee, contemplated in this Section, shall be made annually by the Board having regard to the recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee. Attendance by non-members is not ordinarily expected. All Board members will receive the meeting documentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.038
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.167
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.744
Threshold uncertainty score0.857

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0380.167
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0120.013
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0190.006
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0070.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2560.316

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFolklore, Mythology, and Literature StudiesFrench-language works237,207