“New Regionalist Metropolitan Action: The Case of the Alberta Capital Region Alliance”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Globalization is a defining characteristic of the latter few decades of the 20th century; it is reshaping how we trade, communicate, and relate to one another. Continental trading blocks are emerging, and international trade is allowing the free movement of goods, services, labour, and ideas on a scale that was unimaginable only a few decades ago. Information flows easily and inexpensively across international borders thanks to new technologies, as do people and capital. Physical location no longer poses much of a limitation on the interactions between and among communities and individuals resulting in the destabilization of existing centres of authority and security such as the nation state. National governments find they have less capacity to influence the economy given the decreasing significance of state boundaries in the global market place. As a result, new centres of political power are emerging at various levels and the role of regional economies has increased. While the “low ” politics at the local level may have at one time been passed over for “high ” politics at the national and, to a lesser extent, the provincial level, it is acknowledged that capacity at the national level is decreasing. Attention is focusing on
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.032 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".