ART. No 435 Contribution COB No 607 DISTRIBUTION AND DIVERSITY OF ASTEROIDS IN ATLANTIC
Bibliographic record
Abstract
-Since the last survey of the distribution of the echinoderm fauna in the deep sea, worked out by MADSEN, more than 100 trawlings in various areas of the Atlantic Ocean give new possibilities of characterizing the faunal assemblages of several basins at depths greater than 1800 m. During 12 cruises conducted by the Centre Octanologique de Bretagne, seven atlantic basins (Cape, Angola, European, Labrador, Greenland, and Norwegian Basins) have been intensively prospectt'd. Comparisons of the asteroid faunas (43 species on the whole) are approached with appropriate similarity index, especially the second Kulczynski coefficient, and esti-mates of density and diversity of the fauna art: analysed within each basin for two ranges of depths ( and s- 3000 m). The distinct fauna, and the correlation of low diversity with high densities observcd in the Greenland, Norwegian, Mediterranean, and Cape Basins confirm the isolation of such areas either by topographie barriers or by special ecological conditions.-
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.199 | 0.064 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".