MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7095416123

SUMMARY

2010· article· en· W7095416123 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeasePrincipal (computer security)ExhibitionClosing (real estate)Documentation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Queen Elizabeth Theatre (QET) is a 1,300-seat theatre that was built in 1957. The stage structure consists of a stage 86 foot by 36 foot, a 43-foot fly floor and 9 dressing rooms below the stage level. A Request for Proposals was issued by the Board in 2007 to the private sector for the year-round operation of the QET and at its meeting on March 6, 2008, the Board approved entering into a lease with 16730801 Ontario Ltd (the “Tenant”) as the successful proponent (the “Lease”). The approved Lease term was for 3 years commencing May 1, 2008 and concluding April 30, 2011 and includes the substantive terms and conditions as set out in Appendix “A ” to this report. Since being awarded the Lease, the principal shareholder, Mr. Sinopoli, has invested approximately $550,000 in renovations and audio / lighting equipment in the QET. He has booked 60 shows to date and has another 85 dates on hold for future events and has attracted approximately 60,000 attendees to the grounds. This activity is substantial new business to Exhibition Place grounds as previously the QET was only booked on average 40 days a year. The financial return to the Board from this leasehold from May 1, 2008 to December 31,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.510
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4900.305

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTheatre and Performance Studies→French-language works237,207→