MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7095463210

Prepared for

2010· article· en· W7095463210 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResistorCapacitorTransformerVoltageElectromagnetic coilGeomagnetically induced currentBlocking (statistics)Rogowski coil
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report deals with techniques for protecting the high voltage portion of the U.S. power grid against the effects of geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) resulting from geomagnetic storms and the late time E3 portion of high altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP), which is also known as MHD EMP. The basic concepts of operational modifications, blocking DC series capacitors in the lines and series resistors in the transformer neutral ground connection of wye windings and autotransformers, are introduced in Section 1, and explored in more detail in Section 2. Section 3 examines the existing systems that have introduced series capacitors in a substantial fraction of the system, specifically the Hydro Quebec system from the mid 1990s and the WECC region in the western U.S. It is seen that series capacitors on some lines reduces the GIC currents and production of reactive power, but not by a great amount. Section 4 briefly performs a generic evaluation of the effect of neutral blocking resistors as a function of line length. Section 5 extends this to an examination of the effects of neutral blocking resistors on the high voltage portion of the whole U.S. power grid, using a constant geo-electric field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8700.745

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies→French-language works237,207→