MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7095475652

FIELD TRIALS ON BIOGENERATED V-HF SYSTEMS TO CONTROL THE LARGE NARCISSUS FLY

2015· article· en· W7095475652 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and fungal interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFumigationNarcissusBromideQuarantineGreenhouseGermination
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To develop a methyl bromide (MB) alternative control treatment based on vacuum, hermetic storage, or CO2 enriched controlled atmosphere against the large narcissus fly (Merodon eques) investigations were carried out by Rindner et al. (2003). The large narcissus fly Merodon eques is a quarantine insect species that attacks narcissus bulbs as well as bulbs of other geophytes. Fumigation with methyl bromide (MB) is the only gaseous rapid treatment available for handling infested bulbs. However, the most recent international resolution under terms of the Montreal Protocol, ending the use and production of methyl bromide as well as the phytotoxic effects of MB required further studies to find alternative fumigation methods. According to Rindner et al., (2003) LT 99 values for Merodon eques maggot infested bulbs at 50 mm Hg absolute pressure, at hermetic conditions (for the bio-generation of modified atmospheres) and at 90 % CO2 were 24, 34, and 24 h, respectively. Respiration of the bulbs, under hermetic conditions, depleted the O2 concentration to 0.1 % and increased the CO2 to 21 % within 24 h at 30ºC. The bio-generation of modified atmospheres under hermetic conditions did not adversely affect the germination levels of the bulbs. Based on these findings, Finkelman et al, (2002), reported on results of three semi-commercial experiments

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.155
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlant and fungal interactionsFrench-language works237,207