Who Should Receive the Vaccine? Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
2) Children 24-59 months of age at higher risk of invasive pneumococcal disease • Children who attend child care centres • Children who are Aboriginal • Children who have sickle cell disease and other sickle cell hemoglobinopathies • Children with functional or anatomic asplenia • Children with HIV infection • Children with immunocompromising conditions (e.g., primary immuno-deficiencies; malignancies; conditions resulting from immunosuppres-sive therapy, solid organ transplantation, or use of long-term systemic corticosteroids; nephrotic syndrome) • Children with chronic medical conditions (e.g., chronic cardiac and pul-monary disease such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal disease or CSF leak) • Children with cochlear implants or those receiving cochlear implants 3) Others • All other children in this age group should be encouraged to receive the vaccine even if they are not in the above groups Contraindications and Precautions Do NOT give the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine to: • Children who have had an anaphylactic reaction to a previous dose Dosage Schedule The dose of the conjugate vaccine for all age groups is 0.5 mL. See Canadian Immunization Guide for schedule by age
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.045 | 0.025 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".