A Comprehensive Uxo Clearance Quality Assurance Plan Tracadie Range, New Brunswick, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As part of the Infrastructure Reduction Program, the Canadian Department of National Defence (DND) recently closed the former Tracadie Range and transferred the 18,088 hectare property to the Province of New Brunswick. Associated with the property transfer, DND undertook an Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) Survey of the range in 1995 and 1996 and prepared a Clearance Plan to be undertaken over the years (1997-2001) to address the UXO forecast by the survey to be contained on the site. The actual degree of clearance to be completed on the Range will be sufficient to support the next land use as determined by the Province. 2 In May of 1997, DND retained Dillon ADI to act as the Clearance Inspection Team (CIT) for the duration of the five year Clearance Plan. The CIT concept was developed by DND to oversee contracted range clearance projects and is an integral part of a Comprehensive Quality Assurance Program for most range clearances in Canada and more specifically the Tracadie Range Clearanc...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".