MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7095606004

Addendum-erratum to: “Nonasymptotic critical behavior from field theory at d = 3. II. The ordered-phase case”

2000· article· en· W7095606004 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Physics and Python Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeynman diagramRenormalizationFeynman integralScalar (mathematics)Table (database)Scalar field theoryPath integral formulationQuantum field theorySymmetry (geometry)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This note is intended to emphasize the existence of estimated Feynman integrals in three dimensions for the free energy of the O(1) scalar theory up to five loops which may be useful for other work. We also correct some misprints of the published paper. We present the corrected table I of the original paper [1] which displays the values of the Feynman integrals of the O(1) scalar theory contributing to the free energy up to five loops and their symmetry factors. The values differ from those Feynman integrals previously calculated in [2] 1 due to the necessity of introducing a “soft ” mass parameter instead of the usual renormalized (at zero-momentum) mass (see the text of the original paper [1] and [3] for details). Consequently, many of the estimates of Feynman Integrals presented in table I have been extracted from [2] by accounting for a harmless 3-d renormalization in order to get a soft-mass parameter (characterizing a minimal subtraction scheme similar to that introduced in [4]). Since the five-loop contributions to the free energy involves ϕ 3 vertices mixed to ϕ 4 vertices, Feynman integrals which are different or cannot be obtained from those previously considered in [2] have been estimated in three dimensions for the occasion 2. These are: • the four-loop integrals with Heap’s numbers 13–17 (column h in the following table I, see table IV of [5]). They involve only ϕ 3 vertices. They have been estimated and successfully compared to similar calculations extracted from [6]. • the five-loop integrals with Heap’s numbers 80–102 (see table V of [5]). They involve ϕ 3 vertices mixed with a single ϕ 4 vertex. They have been calculated exclusively for this work. • the five-loop integrals with Heap’s numbers 103–118 (see table V of [5]). They involve only ϕ 3 vertices. They have been calculated for this work and successfully compared to similar calculations extracted from [7]. 1 The unpublished Guelph report [2] may be obtained via H. Kleinert and V. Schulte-Frohlinde web site at

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.250

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0750.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComputational Physics and Python ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207