Representative from the Council of Student Affairs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reason for Procedure 1.1 To set out Procedures secondary to the Co-Curricular Record Policy to manage the facilitation, review, and criteria for activity recognition on the University of Manitoba Co-Curricular Record (CCR). The Co-Curricular Record Policy lists 6 categories that faculty, staff, UMSU, and GSA activities can apply for recognition under: governance, leadership, service-learning, foundational skill development, volunteerism and participation, and awards. This Procedural document outlines the membership of the Co-Curricular Record Review Committee, and the criteria required to receive approval to be listed as an official co-curricular activity. Part II Procedural Content 2.1 The Co-Curricular Record Review Committee shall approve applications for recognition and review all programs recognized on the CCR at the end of each term (December, April and August). 2.2 The Co-Curricular Record Review Committee shall consist of: (a) Director, Student Life (or designate) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it