MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7095669683

An Alternative Use of Crude Glycerin in Canadian

2014· article· en· W7095669683 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiodiesel Production and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPelletBiodieselPelletsRaw materialBiofuelDiesel fuelBiodiesel productionPelletizing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract- With the biofuel mandate and government incentives in different countries, there is a sharp rise in world biodiesel production that has created an excessively abundant supply of crude glycerin, which is a by-product of the transesterification process. Although pure glycerin has many valuable uses in the food, pharmaceutical and cosmetics industries, crude glycerin from biodiesel production cannot be directly used for these purposes. This study investigated an alternative use of crude glycerin in Canadian wood pellet industry. Crude glycerin is produced as a by-product of biodiesel production from canola oil, and is soaked in four different types of wood pellets available in Canadian market at different soak temperatures and times to test the rate of glycerin soaking by the wood pellets. Physical properties such as bulk density, durability, fines, etc. are tested according to the Pellets Fuel Institute standard specifications for residential/commercial densified fuel. Fuel properties are measured by ultimate and proximate analyses for wood pellet samples without and with glycerin-soaking. Finally, a wood pellet stove is tested to compare the emissions of CO, HC, NOx and CO2 between pure and glycerin-soaked wood pellets. Index Term- Crude glycerin, Canadian wood pellet industry, Glycerin soaking in wood pellets, Fuel characterization, Wood pellet stove, Emissions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.547
Threshold uncertainty score0.779

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiodiesel Production and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207