MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7095671207

UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Evaluation of 2-Dimensional Ionosphere Models for National And Regional GPS Networks in Canada

2004· article· en· W7095671207 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobal Positioning SystemTECSpherical harmonicsSpline (mechanical)IonosphereGridGeomagnetic stormTotal electron content
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this research is to determine a 2-dimensional ionosphere model, applicable in real-time, that provides optimal accuracy of vertical delays at ionospheric grid points (IGPs). This model is based on GPS delays measured at ionospheric pierce points (IPPs), as observed from dual-frequency GPS tracking stations. Two algorithms are selected for possible implementation: spherical harmonic model and thin plate spline interpolation. These methods are based on two-dimensional estimation on an ionospheric shell at 350 km altitude. The input observations are computed as slant delays using dual frequency GPS observations. In the spherical harmonics model, the coefficients and receiver differential code biases are estimated every 5 minutes in a real-time mode using a Kalman filter. Thin-plate spline is a 2-dimensional generalization of the cubic spline in 1 dimension. The basic idea of this method is to build a function that passes through the grid points and minimizes the roughness of the surface. The performance of the two algorithms is evaluated in terms of accuracy of the residuals between observed vertical TECs (VTECs) and estimated VTECs at IGPs in two GPS networks: Canadian Active Control System (CACS) and Western Canada Deformation Array (WCDA). The evaluation results show that the thin plate spline outperforms the spherical harmonics model in both networks. The spatial and temporal variation of the geomagnetic storm is also investigated by plotting vertical TEC maps over Canada. In considering the VTEC maps generated for the storm period, it is observed that regions with large enhancements of vertical TEC coincide well with the locations of stations with larger rms values. iii

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.326
Threshold uncertainty score0.853

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGNSS positioning and interferenceFrench-language works237,207