Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mapping has virtually been completed on the batholith (scale- 1:1320) and the next phase of the program will be to refine contacts, descriptions of rock units, and their relationships to one another. This will be done by carrying out detailed work on some of the mining properties. REGIONAL SETTING The Iron Mask batholith is a multiphase intrusion comprised of Iron Mask Hybrid, Pothook, Sugarloaf, and Cherry Creek units, each of which has several varietie!.. The rocks are fine grained and fine porphyritic to coarse grained and are silica-poor rmging from gabbro to syenite composition with diorite predominating. Major systems of northwesterly, northerly, and northeasterly trending recurrilig fractures or faults controlled emplacement of various units of the Iron Mask batholith. The batholith was emplaced in a high level volcanic to subvolcanic environment, comagmatic with Nicola volcanic rocks and coeval with part of the upper Nicola succession. The batholith intruded volcanic and sedimentary rocks of the lower Nicola but the Cherry Creek unit occurs both as fragments within, and is in intrusive contact with, uppermost Nicola rocks. The Nicola and Iron Mask rocks are unconformably overlain by Tertiary sedinentary and volcanic rocks of the Kamloops Group. In many places on and along the flanks of the batholith the pre-Tertiary erosion surface appears nearly to coincide with the present day erosion surface. Erosional remnants of Tertiary volcanic rocks cap the higher hills and occur in places along their flanks. This pre-Tertiary erosional surface appears to have been very irregular although post-Tertiary faulting may have accentuated this apparent irregularity and resulted in local preservation of post-batholith rocks within the batholith. GEOLOGY Rock descriptions are based on field observations of texture, composition, intensity of alteration. These descriptions are subject to revision when studies are completed. Major rock units are shown on Figure IO. and type and
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.849 | 0.750 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".