MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7095749963

CASCADE DECOMPOSITION WITH CANONICAL SCATTERING POLYNOMIALS

2008· article· en· W7095749963 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering and Technology Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCascadeRealization (probability)Lossless compressionProduct (mathematics)Matrix (chemical analysis)Degree (music)Transfer (computing)Canonical formDecomposition
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract — The decomposition of the transfer matrix T into a product of two simpler transfer matrices T a and T b, i.e., T = T a T b is discussed. Where T a corresponds to one of the elementary sections which are organized as a table in this paper and that T b has the same properties as T except a lower degree is proved rigorously in Theorems 1 and 2. Replacing T with T b, the decomposed procedure can be repeated until all elementary sections are extracted. Following Theorems 1 and 2, one necessary and sufficient condition for the cascade synthesis of a lossless, passive, two-port network from a given canonic set of scattering polynomials is obtained. Finally, based on the decomposition, a synthesis algorithm is presented for the realization of a lossless, passive, two-port network. REFERENCE [Jarm90] M. R. Jarmasz “A simplified synthesis of lossless two-port wave digital and analog fil ters,” Ph.D. Thesis, University. of Manitoba, Winnipeg,1990. [Fett70] A. Fettweis “Factorization of transfer matrices of lossless two-ports, ” IEE Trans. Circuit Theory,”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEngineering and Technology InnovationsFrench-language works237,207