MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7095789608

ForewordCSIRO PUBLISHING www.publish.csiro.au/journals/ijwf International Journal of Wildland Fire 2009, 18, 233–234 2007 EastFIRE Conference: introduction to special issue

2015· article· en· W7095789608 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublishingSubject (documents)Natural (archaeology)West coastProject commissioning
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wildland fire is a global process, subject to regional characteri-zation, with localized impacts on natural resources, people and their social systems. Fire science strives to meld international-and national-scale applicability with regional- and local-scale application. Satellite observations reinforce the belief that as the basic combustion and behaviour processes governing fire are globally consistent, models of those processes should be adaptable to local conditions. Although the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System is a notable exception, years of scien-tific effort have gone into developing fire systems that are often not accepted outside of their region of origin within a nation, or across national boundaries. The United States are regionally divided into east, interior west and west coast in terms of ecosys-tem domains and demographic distributions. The eastern United States are approximately bounded by the west side of the Missis-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.295

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7930.570

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFire effects on ecosystems→French-language works237,207→