To appear in Canadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Two High Performance and Low Power Serial Communication Interfaces for On-chip Interconnects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: This paper presents two novel methods for on-chip serial communication whereby the clocks of the transmitter and the receiver are generated with two separate ring oscillators. These oscillators are identical although they can have some a small frequency difference. In the first method, a strobe line, which toggles exactly once with every frame of n-bit data, is used to activate the oscillators. Local counters are used to count the number of bits in the data frame and to stop the local oscillators when the frame is processed. In the second method, a single physical line is used to transmit both data and (inband) control information, further reducing the power dissipation. The data transmission is controlled by the output of a starter flip-flop, indicating the empty/full status of an input buffer whereas the data reception is controlled by decoding a ‘1 ” start bit and a ‘0 ’ end bit which have been added to the n-bit data word to form a frame. Our circuit simulation results demonstrate that both communication methods result in high bandwidth and low power dissipation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.276 | 0.094 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".