MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7095850512

INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT PRESCRIPTION Canada thistle

2013· article· en· W7095850512 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIrish and British Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThistleIntegrated pest managementCirsium arvenseBiological pest controlPEST analysisPest controlWeed controlInflorescence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) is a perennial, which grows from 3 to 6 feet in height and has an extensive underground root system. Flowers are small, numerous and lavender to white in color. The flower heads grow on the tips of branches, male and female flowers are found on different plants, and both must be present to produce viable seeds. Viable seeds can remain dormant in the soil for up to 20 years. Leaves are long and narrow, deeply lobed with sharp, yellow spines on the edges. Canada thistle spreads by seed and aggressive, creeping, horizontal roots (rhizomes) that can extend 15 feet and vertical roots 6-15 feet deep. Nearly all parts of the root can produce buds that develop into shoots that grow and form new plants. Root segments as small as 1/8 to 3/8 inch in length and 1/16 inch in diameter can produce new plants. Impacts: Canada thistle is highly invasive. It can spread quickly to form dense patches, crowding out forage grasses by up to 60 percent. Canada thistle competes with crops,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.290
Threshold uncertainty score0.584

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIrish and British StudiesFrench-language works237,207