MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7095863356

Revisiting the Ruby Terrane: Insights from Geologic Mapping in the Moran Area, Central-Interior Alaska

2015· article· en· W7095863356 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerranePaleozoicSchistPeliteZirconDalradianGeologic mapMetamorphic rockLineationMetamorphism
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

logic mapping in the Moran Dome area of Central-Interior Alaska. The Moran project map area is located 150 miles west of Fairbanks, in the eastern Kokrines Hills, immediately north of the Yukon River, which follows the Kaltag, re-gional-scale, right-lateral, strike-slip fault system. DGGS geologists have distinguished eight mappable units, two re-gional metamorphic events, at least four ductile deformation events, and a single intrusive event followed by brittle de-formation; at least three metallogenetic events overlap the area. The Proterozoic to Paleozoic Ruby Terrane (RT) underlies most of the Moran area. DGGS subdivides the RT into five meta-sedimentary units, which spatially correspond with interpretations of the DGGS Moran airborne geophysical da-ta. From structurally lowest to highest they are paragneiss and pelitic schist, calcareous-mica-albite-quartz schist, massive to foliated graphitic quartzite, pelitic schist and metagrit, and an interlayered graphitic quartz schist and quartzite unit. Detrital zircon U/Pb ages in three samples of the RT are predominantly Paleozoic with a minimum inter-preted age of middle Triassic. In contrast, a fourth sample from the pelitic schist-metagrit unit is characterized by abun-dant Paleoproterozoic detrital zircons, similar to samples from the Wickersham grit and the Yukon-Tanana terrane. Shallow-dipping S2 foliation is axial planar to recumbent F2 isoclinal folds, and refolded by upright, open-to-close-profile NE- and SW-plunging F3 folds and lesser upright, open-to-close-profile NW- and SE-plunging F4 folds. Stretch-ing lineations plunge shallowly to the NW and SE. A Kaltag-parallel, steep, E–W-trending, S3 foliation cuts S2 along the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.383

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and Exploration→French-language works237,207→