THE SECURITIES ACT NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 81-101 FORMS 81-101F1 AND 81-101F2 AND COMPANION POLICY 81-101CP MUTUAL FUND PROSPECTUS DISCLOSURE AND NOTICE OF REVOCATION OF CANADIAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS NOTICE AND RESCISSION OF
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SP Form and AIF Form, collectively, the "Forms") as Rules under the Act, and has adopted Companion Policy 81-101CP Mutual Fund Prospectus Disclosure (the "Companion Policy") as a Policy under the Act. The National Instrument, the Forms and the Companion Policy are initiatives of the Canadian Securities Administrators (the "CSA"). The National Instrument has been, or is expected to be, adopted as a rule in each of British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario and Nova Scotia, a Commission regulation in Saskatchewan, and a policy in all other jurisdictions represented by the CSA. The Forms will be adopted as rules in Ontario and British Columbia. The Companion Policy has been, or is expected to be, implemented as a policy in all of the jurisdictions represented by the CSA. The National Instrument, the Forms, and the material required by the Act to be delivered to the Minister of Finance were delivered on November 12, 1999. If the Minister does not approve the National Instrument, reject the National Instrument or return it to the Commission for further consideration by January 11, 2000, or if the Minister approves the National Instrument, the National Instrument will come into force, pursuant to section 7.1 of the National Instrument, on February 1, 2000. If the Minister does not approve the Forms, reject the Forms or return them to the Commission for further consideration, the Forms will come into force on February 1, 2000. The Companion Policy will come into force on the day that the National Instrument comes into force. The CSA published drafts of the National Instrument (the
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.137 | 0.127 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".