Bibliographic record
Abstract
This repert describes at evaluation of the effectO of and _ grade 7 immersion programs on the_English,and:French-Aangnage skills_of student's at the end cf grade 7 in Montreal. Tests olf English 'language skills were administered'to-early immersion, _*ade 7 immersion, and English control students. Test cf French langtage skills ere administered to the.same gxcupsand_to, a. grOdp of seventh grade native French speakers. A 400Stichndire designed to-measure attitudes towards various ethtolinguiStic__cups 'NO administered to the three groups of Aigloplioneestudents. A language gueStionnatre determined studentS.I mse_of_Erench_in_ard.ont of _.school. Results. show that: (1) immersion programs are not detrimental to the development of English language skillS cr to academic achievemenit of children in such programs; (2) early immersion has a greater Xmpact on the development cf French language skills than does selienth,'grade immersion, but that the latter fostered the develtpment
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".