Digital Video and Still Photographs Tides Preliminary Results Access to Data and Samples
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canada's ports and harbours require routine dredging to maintain operational viability and allow passage of deep-draft vessels. Dredge spoils from these operations are often placed in offshore disposal sites. Monitoring of these disposal sites is required to understand the long-term fate of the dredged materials. The Geological Survey of Canada (GSC), a division of Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) have initiated a project "Assessing Marine Environmental Quality in coastal Waters of Eastern Canada", that is designed to assess the effects of human activities in marine environments. The project will provide decision makers with geoscience information to resolve user conflicts and balance competing demands for seafloor use and development with conservation. One of the project priorities is to assess the impact of marine disposal of dredge spoil. Conceptual models will be developed for the behaviour of material in disposal sites under various marine environments, ranging from quite sheltered areas to exposed sites with high tidal and current stress. The project focuses on sites with differing degrees of human impact, management, and user conflict. The project will provide outputs, consisting of maps conforming to new marine-mapping protocols, databases in high-priority areas, conceptual models and reports. The primary
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".